In their imagine, therefore, the ideals of nirvana ruling regarding the role to be played by reason in structuring new, freer and egalitarian societies were never fully know.
In fact, as Marx and Engels (2) vomit up it:
"Each step in the development of the bourgeoisie was go with by a corresponding political advance in that class. An oppressed class under the sway of the feudal nobility, an build up and self-governing association of medieval commune.... The bourgeoisie has at last, since the system of Modern Industry and of the world market, conquered for itself, in the modern vocalization state, exclusive political sway. The executive of the modern state is precisely a committee for managing the common affairs of the whole bourgeoisie."
This view of mankind as bound by the conditions of labor and slip to class differentions and disadvantages directly challenges the Enlightenment argument that a kindly contract which acknowledges the self-sufficiency of all individuals regardless of their status or skills or wealth. It argues that modern societies that are driven by industrial capitalism were in retreat from the theoretical constructs of the Enlightenment and that the very(prenominal) mode of production which had emerged was such that no genuine autonomy for the masses could be achieved. Ma
Brecht, Bertolt. " self-contained Plays Volume V." New York:
Theorizing the subject of man and what he is and what matters to him was requirement in all of these works. The reaction against the extreme rationalism of the Enlightenment that one finds in the Romantic poets suggests a return to a simpler and therefore more comfortable time. In contrast, the dialectics of Marx and Engels, the will to origin of Nietzsche and his debunking of many various idols, and the conflict expressed by Brecht do not say that Reason does not operate, plainly questions its limits.
By looking at these poets, one becomes cognizant of a retreat from overreliance on the primacy of Reason and a return of sorts to an taste perception of emotion.
Emotional involvement with simple pleasures was pictured by these poets as relieving man of the cares and worries that were likely to be associated with human existence. This is a different approach to rejecting the Enlightenment than that taken by materialists such as Marx and Engels (9) who claim that industrial capitalism corrupts class relationships and exacerbates the longstanding class struggles which pit one group of men against another and deprecate the labor of the proletariat.
www.anu.edu.au/polsci/marx/classics/manifesto.html.
The Nitzschean view is therefore focused on the construction of a society in which nothing is ravishing leave out man and nothing is ugly except for the degenerate man. Tragically, he found a relatively small number of beautiful men who were possessed of "power, will to power, courage, pride" (Nietzsche, 526). This position, though distinct in many ways from the ideas advanced by Marx and Engels (7) regarding the stultifying mold of the bourgeoisie, clearly suggests that post-Enlightenment ideals had not been realized and could not be realized because they failed to take into account the true nature of human beings in the aggregate.
Other poets of the Romantic era such as Samuel Taylor Coleri
Ordercustompaper.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!
No comments:
Post a Comment