Goals of the Small Claims Court

In such instances, the cases ar non initially brought before the judicatory.

INTENDED PURPOSES OF SMALL CLAIMS COURTS

A general purpose stated for polished claims courts is to hear contends involving beautiful amounts of money, with come out long delays, and in the absence of formal rules of evidence.5 In a broader context, the down in the mouth claims court is viewed as a political institution specializing in conflict resolution, which is intended to provide a mechanism of two social and semipolitical control.6 In effect, in this context, the small claims court, by providing ordinary citizens with a relatively uncomplicated procedure for the settling of relatively unimportant economic disputes, facilitates the maintenance of social and political control by the societal elite.7

For the greater part, the Ameri tail assembly population has long accepted and cherished the notion of the United States as an egalitarian and classless society. There is a contention, however, that an American societal establishment does, indeed, exist. While the concept of an American establishment is unsounded not fully accepted, its cousin, the concept of an American power elite, is astray accepted. 3

The most spirited contemporary discussions of these con cepts do not emphasize the existence or nonexistence of an establishment or a power elite in the United States. Rather, such discussions atomic number 18 more likely to be concerned with the defini tion and committal to writing of an establishment or a

Steele, E. H. "The Historical Context of Small Claims Court." American Bar grounding Research Journal, 293 (1981): 241.

Critics of the free market concept divvy up that indivi dualism and selfishness are not necessarily attributed to be promoted in society, til now if they do contribute to the devel opment of a more efficient economy. Additionally, however, these critics can point to the Japanese economy (where indi vidualism and selfishness are not ideals) for an specimen of how other attributes can also promote economic efficiency.

separate critics point out that the socially responsibile societies in Austria, Sweden, and the Federal body politic of Ger some (west) are much more efficient economically than are the more unequal societies in the United States and the United Kingdom. Shotter pointed out (as have others) that the free market concept neither (1) provides uprightness in economic distribution, nor (2) eliminates economic injustice in many situations, regardless of the competitive check. There are situations in a free market

This article analyses the cases brought before small claims courts along a dimension of admitted liability. Defendants may admit no liability, fond(p) liability, or full liability. The explore reported in the article found that consumer issues constitute the major portion of the case charge up for a small claims court. The research also found that defendants in the main fare quite well in small claims courts, when they dispute claims made against them. With respect to business defendants, the research found that small firms, rather than large firms, were more likely to be involve in a case brought before a small claims court. The general theme of the article is that small claims courts are as effective, if not moreso, that are mediation processes.

In 1984, Neil Vidmar assessed the small claims court as a dispute settling mechanism. In this assessment, the research focused only on the economic aspects of the disputes brought before
Ordercustompaper.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!