The most important affaire to note is that both artists paint with a Gothic and elusive style with their characteristics of a gold background and noticeable halos. When separate these two pieces of art, the main residuum is the placement of the figures in each painting. In Cimabues painting, the angels are depicted around the throne with each row at different levels. This causes the angels to appear as if they are stacked on top of one another, opposed Giottos painting. In Giottos artwork, the angels are placed in a way that provides a more horizontal-like depiction that is not seen in the first artwork. The first row of angels appears closer to the informant whereas the back row seems farther away. All of the angels have clear visible features and each even shows a hint of translucent emotion.
Another distinction between the two works is that of the throne. In Cimabues painting, the throne sits upon a curved platform whereas in Giottos painting, there is an addition of a roof above the Madonnas head, as well as the fact that it is sitting on a flat platform.
These two differences not only add perspicaciousness to the painting, but they also cause the figure to appear be closer to the viewer, almost as if it is a three-dimensional artwork. Giottos bloody shame is also more firmly attached to the ground, while Cimabues bloody shame seems almost as if she is floating in space.
Another difference between the two works is that Cimabue painted bloody shame and the angels with large fingers and noses and he also used lines to define her clothing. Giotto portrayed Mary as a recognizable figure instead of as an idealized one. He used dark and light severalise in her clothing and made her physically larger than the Mary in the first painting to show her presence. Giotto shows...If you want to last a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment