In a world where our perception and understanding of the place in which we live is influenced by our surroundings and the way we view them, it is definitive that we pay heed at all aspects of the matter from all viewpoints, some(prenominal) through the lens and with open eyes. In this case, I keep with Sontag in the fact that we pilet learn about the world conscionable from what the photographic camera has captured, tho disagree with her idea that run into taking is ban in the way that it allows for us to fill our minds and makes us feel.
Sontag says that photography implies that what we know about the world if we accept it as the camera records it. (LI, P1)A photographer takes a picture of a regular, ageing weapons factory; a simple picture. In reality, this is a picture of the Krupp, a manufacturing company in which assisted Nazi Germany in the persecution of nearly 11 million people. Sontag is absolutely right. Photographs are deceiving, and maven never understands anything from a photograph (L6-7, P1) How can we be persuaded to conceptualize that Nazi Germany wasnt all that bad, from a simple photograph? How can we rely on photography to be our outlet to the out of doors world?
Pictures can be a nice to look at, and we can infer from them what we like, but the picture cant tell us what it is, it cant explain to us the symbolism or far-fetched meaning that lies tin it. This can not be the way in which we look for to understand the world.
No, we can not learn anything about or understand the world from looking at a picture, but a picture never the less is art, which has the power to regain and help so many. There is no denying...
If you want to stomach a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment