This paper is about Kudler?s leading style and how this leadership style has an effect on the organization environment. What washbowl you infer about the leadership style at Kudler Fine Foods establish on organizational per getance? How is that leadership style evidentially reflected in the employee motivation at Kudler?small and bigWith out a doubt, the origin of the organization is in Katy?s hands and she makes well single-valued function of it. Katy is involved in all decisivenesss, small and big. Katy does non impute as she should if she wants Kudler organization to keep growing. As an example that Katy does not delegate, we found on Kudler?s intranet in the organization behaviour page (Gomez-Mejia, L. Balkin, D 2002) ? Kathy considers one of her key responsibilities to be that of appointment of new gourmet items that can be offered in her stores.? The supra statement shows that Katy believes that she is the only one capable of good decision making. Consequently, Katy?s leadership style is autocratic with some pop tints when Katy consults with Kudler?s managers for advice on her decisions. These consultations promote a positive aura on Kudler?s culture. However, Katy?s ideas prevail on the considerable run.
The power use by Katy to influence on her employees can be classified according to the five powers of managers by B Raven as legitimate, rewards, and some coercive. Consequently, Katy is a transactional leader.
Legitimate, (legal) she is the owner of the organization. Rewards (trade put up by rewards) Katy has implemented both financial and physiological rewards to prod employees. Employees are evaluated by their supervisor every year. The evaluation form helps supervisors set individual goals and benchmarks for each employee. Good employees receive promotions, high salaries, and higher status inside the company. Coercive, (fear the leader) the same evaluation helps supervisor identify employees...
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment