It can be said that the majority of the first six-spot books of Herodotus The Histories can be divided into deuce distinct categories: heathenish history where Herodotus discusses customs, beliefs, and daily lives of the people of Greece, Egypt, Persia, and other foreign lands; and semipolitical history where Herodotus speaks about the governments, kings, drawing cards, and military actions of the aforementi wholenessd lands. However, while these two opposing histories can be separated, they are far from separate, and it is this crossing of peoples and government which tillers for some of the most interesting segments of Herodotus inquiries. Being inquiries as he states in the opening line of Book I, though, one can wonder why it is he chooses to continually save about these two opposing groups, and what point he is assay to imply by doing so. It would seem more than likely that his cerebration on government would at least somewhat bear on his writings, and through what he includes and the way he chooses to include itOne such(prenominal) implication which Herodotus seems to make throughout his work is that rulers who are non just are punished in the end, regardless of the abilities or position. One such example is Cambyses dying of a inglorious wound in the same spot where he stabbed Apis, the blessed bull.
Herodotus probably chose to include this so as to show Cambyses take in mortality and show that leaders are punished for their hubris. Herodotus seems to make a point of showing Cambyses as an unjust leader through his killing of Apis, dealings with the Egyptians, and his killing of his own servants for frugality Croesus, so by telling of Cambyses ironic death by his own sword, Herodotus makes a point of showing that rulers should not jest at their power. This is further reinforced when...
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment