        Eyewitness testimony has always been a crucial ingredient in criminal trials. Attorneys depend a great hide on this type of testimony, especially because it seems to be the most convincing means in convincing the jury of a defendants guilt. In the case of the rape of Jennifer Thompson, however, a very important chief is raised. How can someone be mistakenly convicted of a horror? Because Jennifer appeared so confident in her eyewitness testimony, she easily positive(p) the jury that Ronald Cotton was guilty of committing the rape. Carefully examining this case from a psychological standpoint, one can clearly understand where the faults were made. at that place are many categories in which these faults can be classified, more(prenominal) specifically that of overconfidence and confirmation bias. These faults also relate to studies performed by various psychologists such as Gary Wells and Elizabeth Loftus.
        During the early hours of the morning, Jennifers contribute was broken into by a man who ended up raping her. Jennifer made a conscious effort to remember enlarge of the perpetrator while the rape was occurring. As soon as she saw a chance to escape, she ran to a neighbors house and called the topical anaesthetic authorities. She was taken to a hospital where she underwent the process of providing evidence for a rape kit.
She was also questioned by police, where she recalled details of the man who had dishonor her: African American, male, dark eyes, etc. After her interrogation by the police, they informed her that another woman had been raped in the corresponding area that same night just a a couple of(prenominal) hours after Jennifers rape had taken place. She also found knocked out(p) that another young woman had been raped, as well that night. Afterward, she was shown a photo collection by law enforcement and was asked to select a...
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment