Science vs. Romanticism

Science/technology and Romanticism I believe that there is a balance that exists between apprehension and romanticism because everybody will eventually have to view more or lessthing in a scientific way, whether it is a particular profession or simply an activity which they ar in contact with every day. That being said, one particular trade is not all inclusive, so not everybody will see scientifically or technologically about the same items or activities.For example, Mark suspender said, No, the romance and dish antenna were all gone from the river, to show that what he formerly felt about the glorious river had now vanished due to his job as a riverboat pilot, where he trades the knowledge of the river for its beauty. In the same way he talked about a doctor what does a lovely flush in a beauty cheeks mean to a doctor but a break that ripples above some deadly disease? The doctor reads the beauty of the girl for the knowledge that he uses in his medical practice. There is a balance between Mark Twain and the doctor because Twain calm sees the beauty in the girl, and the doctor continues to see and understand the romance and beauty of the river. though each perceives their respective activities in a scientific way, they can call off each other because neither sees the technological side of everything.In a way, a person in our society takes a certain career course or a pacific stock for the exact purpose of allowing others to keep an eye on the beauty of these areas of life through their ignorance, while the person taking the Job sacrifices their ignorance for knowledge which, in effect, sucks the beauty out of the profession. The balance that exists between science and romanticism remains because we all see beauty in some things that others see the science in, while others see the beauty that inhabits the things that we can hardly distinguish the technology and science in.