Carlos Fuentes' "The Death of Artemio Cruz"

Had Diaz been more genteel, perhaps, the peasantry (which was deprived and repressed) and middle class never would have fought on the same side. As it was, of course, aft(prenominal) the revolution the bourgeoisie's gentility kept the peasantry as temporally oppress as it had ever been. But the symbol of a roughhewn revolution retained power with erstwhile crossclass allies long enough for the better educated and financed to fasten themselves in the postrevolutionary Mexican power structure.

why this is a betrayal that Artemio personifies is that the successful revolt against Diaz presented the revolutionaries with clear choices in the way the goals of the revolution would be carried out. In part, the choices stemmed from the feature that, as Hart notes, disparate social classes, "the peasantry, industrial and urban workers, pequena burguesia, and provincial elitesmanifested distinct revolutionary objectives during the struggle. Their visions included violently conflicting goals as well as reconcilable ones" (4:2). The "multiclass" rebellion, if successful, would inevitably arrive at a new order that would be confronted with competing goals from its inception.

The fact that Artemio, wishful as he is, sees more opportunity in allying himself with the materialresultsoriented bourgeoisie, shows that he was, after all, interested less in "pure" revolution than in staking a claim for in-person revolutionary goals. He becomes a key play

productive system. Campesinos rebelled to regain municipal

statements of sympathy that will protrude in the newspapers?

knew how to fuck 'em without letting them fuck you; . . .

responsible. We have allowed ourselves to be divided and

slowly back to the library, unfortunate land where each

Ordercustompaper.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!