Thursday, December 13, 2018
'Border Security and Terrorism Essay\r'
'The only way that whatsoever(prenominal) agricultural raft effectively prevent misgivingist attacks is by improve the local security on a domestic scale. According to the Center for Strategic and adult malewide Studies, ââ¬Å"the protection of processs and ports of introway argon vital to the mastery of this c axerophtholaign (Campbell & Flourney 372)ââ¬Â. The issue here, however, is that by elevated stricter immigration laws and beefing up beach security, the rich American bequest of legal immigration becomes threatened.\r\nAs to a great tip and to a greater extent people and politicians alike cite the insistency pick out to improve telephone security, that rich legacy comes to mind. According to Dave Camp, former Chairman of the country of origin protective covering Subcommittee on besieges and Infrastructure, ââ¬Å"while there is a need to protect the run intos and ports of entry, any new policies regarding this matter do not rush to intervene wi th the avowed American history of legal immigration (1)ââ¬Â. What the policies do apprize is that if there are those who violate the immigration and echo laws, they will be dealt with strictly (Campbell & Flourney 377).\r\nPlans ofttimes(prenominal) as a REAL ID act or the removal of certain asylum laws that have loopholes are certainly plans that deserve a serious consideration. The entry of the attackers of 9/11 was greatly facilitated by the promiscuous immigration subscribeards and other legal loopholes. These allowed the fearists to secure driverââ¬â¢s licenses and other permits that allowed them to campaign around the country freely and make the preparations that they needed to do (Campbell & Flourney 377). If the border security measures were not as on the loose(p) those days, it might have even led to the cake of 9/11.\r\nCampbell & Flourney, in their study on measures against terrorism have cited that, ââ¬Å"A turgid shade in moderate the po ssibility of terrorist attacks lies in alter border securityââ¬Â (372). Many critics have continually cited that the first smell in winning the struggle against terror is by first preventing the happening of any future attacks. As such(prenominal), airline security in conjunction with border security must be improved. The American-Mexican Border mud to be the largest concern since it cadaver as the largest security vulnerability of the get together States.\r\nThe porous domestic border could provide much great problems than that of illegal immigration. It could lead to the entry of terrorist groups into the United States on a massive scale, leading to the proliferation of a large number of terrorists in the United States and possibly the presidential term of a network that would make them extremely knockout to appreh closing curtain (Campbell & Flourney 372). Current Success of Border credentials As earlier mentioned, the role of border security in the fight agains t terror is crucial.\r\nThe accepted governing reorganization program that has been proposed places the Department of Homeland Security, the Customs and Border Protection Program and the Immigration-Customs Enforcement agencies downstairs a single operating body (Carafano 1). This move alone betokenifies that America is serious in curbing these terrorist attacks and that improving border security is a study factor. The bordering figure shows the attacks that have been prevented. Since the 9/11 attacks, over 19 terrorist attacks have been th warted.\r\nMuch of this advantage has been attributed to the Border Security measures that have been set in place since then. Almost all of these attacks have been intercepted by the careful monitoring of the activities that have occurred at the border. The passing play of not only terrorists but also terrorist weapons is a major concern for the Department of Homeland Security and the Customs and Border Protection Program. The porous an d conquerable American-Mexican Border remains the key element in taking the war against terror to the next take.\r\nWithout the new border security situation at the level that it is in at the present, most of those 19 attempts could not have been prevented (Taylor 3). According to most experts who are studying this matter, ââ¬Å"the key remains to be in retention the inflow of people and goods into the United States under closing curtain scrutiny (Campbell & Flourney 372). ââ¬Â While there has been much success in this, there still remains the question on what further improvements can be made against such a devious and imposture foe.\r\nFuture of Border Security It has clearly been found at this point that in order to be effective in the war on terror border security needs to be improved. The government must take a firm stand on the policies that will be implement in the area of border security. While such policies may threaten certain precepts that America is known for such as the legacy of legal immigration, it must be remembered that sacrifices are sometimes necessary to protect the greater interests of the American public (Taylor 12).\r\nIf it means that legal immigration may be throttled to a certain extent in order to ensure the safety of the American public, it is certain that there are more than a few Americans who would stand by that decision. As it is, more and more funding has gone into the improvement of border security particularly with regard to airline regulations and ports of entry as well as along the American-Mexican border.\r\nââ¬Å"Laws that have funded the increase in the number of fences along the border have been drafted and stricter port of entry rules have been established,ââ¬Â correspond to studies done on this subject (Taylor 12). The next step lies in ensuring that these measures push through and that they are implemented effectively. It has been said that increasing the security measures that are presently in place will send the handle message to the terrorists and instead signal to them that they have won and that America has given in (Taylor 12).\r\nEnsuring oneââ¬â¢s safety, however, should never be considered as a sign of cowardice or defeat. Instead, it should send the message that the United States and its people will not give up and will not give in to the terrorist tactics of these groups. Concrete steps such as improving border security are one of the umteen ways by which the United States government can show that they are serious and determined to end the war on terror. Conclusion When it comes to the war on terror, every other person seems to be of the faith that there is one solution that is better than the next one.\r\nEveryone seems to think that there is one sure heighten way of dealing with the situation. Truth be told, it would be perfect if that were really the case because it would have meant that the war on terror would already be over. The reprehensible rea lity is that terrorism still continues to be a growing threat against all civilizations in the world today. While theories abound, success stories against the war on terror are far and few. This is not to say that policies to servicing improve border security are a waste of time but it rather serves to try a very important point.\r\nThe war on terror cannot be solved by good implementing one policy or one program. The receipt to problem will never be as quick or as earth shake as the event that intensified the problem. Efforts to improve border security are just one of the some things that need to be done to combat the terrorists. Be that as it may, it still is one of the more crucial steps to stop terrorism. References: Campbell, Kurt and Flourney, Michelle (2001). To Prevail: An American strategy for the Campaign Against Terrorism. Washington, DC: Center for Strategic and world(prenominal) Studies.\r\n'
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment