Give Children the Vote? I Vote No Essay -- Essay Critique Children Vot

guide Children the Vote? What I nominate is that children be allowed to grow into their own right to vote at whatsoever rate suits them individually, designates Vita Wallace as her major claim in the essay institute children the vote (1998, p.147). This is a thoughtful argument by Wallace, but I disagree with it. In this essay, Wallace presents her opinion, but the major claim could overly be presented as a fact, judgment, or policy (McFadden, 2003). Throughout the essay, I follow the interesting approach Wallace takes to try convince the audience. In my opinion she is unsuccessful.Wallaces major claim, giving children the vote, is a good one and something many kids grovel about these days. She presents this argument in defense of kids, including herself, which she feels are being discriminated against. Wallace was fellowship schooled, so she guesss children should not be punished for choosing not to attend school. She continues saying, attainment about discriminator y laws pr sluiceting high school dropouts from getting their drivers licenses (1998, p.145) made her think about the unfair treatment of kids. Realizing all the rights children flatten out on, Wallace focuses on the right to vote. She was 16 when she wrote this essay and feels ready to vote. In fact she states, I think I would not have voted until I was eight or nine, but perhaps if I had known I could vote I would have taken an interest sooner (1998, p.147). The qualifiers also play a big role in Give children the vote. A qualifier is a word or two that modifies the claim (McFadden, 2003). Wallace does a good job with the qualifiers, and makes the claim stand out a teentsy better. Wallaces major claim, again, is children should have the right to vote. But ... ...-election depends on the offbeat of the voters (1998, p.146). Here, again, she uses a statement that has no evidence and more importantly, doesnt even focus on the issue of kids voting.Wallace has worthwhile id eas, but I believe she needs to develop her research methods and legitimate arguments. Unfortunately, she uses her own examples, reasoning, and analysis to argue for the claim to allow kids to vote. Credible sources or harder evidence might be more useful in Wallaces case. ReferencesClark, I. L. (1998). The genre of argument. Boston Thompson-HeinleMcFadden, J. (Sept. 12 & 14, 2003). The toulmin method From classical logic to modern argumentation. Lecture. Buena Vista University. Storm Lake, IA.Wallace, V. (1998). Give children the vote. The genre of argument. Ed. Irene L. Clark. Boston Thompson-Heinle. p.145-48