Perspectives of Emile Durkheim and Karl Marx Essay -- Sociology Compar

Perspectives of Emile Durkheim and Karl Marx The seventeenth and eighteenth centuries were full of evolving br new(prenominal)ly and sparing ideas. These views of the social structure of urban familiarity came ab bring out through the tuition of ideas taken from the past revolutions. As the Industrial Revolution progressed through out the world, so did the gap between the class structures. The development of a capitalistic society was a very favorable goal for the upper class. By using advanced methods of production introduced by the Industrial Revolution, they were able to collect a substantial surplus by ruling the middle class. Thus, maintaining their bewilder class of life, while the middle class was exploited and degraded. At this quantify in history, social theorists like Emile Durkheim and Karl Marx challenged the aspect of social structure in their works. Emile Durkheim is known as a functionalist states that everything serves a function in society and his main concern to discover what that function was. On the other lapse Karl Marx, a conflict theorist, stresses that society is a complex arranging characterized by inequality and conflict that generate social change. two Durkheim and Marx were concerned with the characteristics of groups and structures instead than with individuals. The functionalist perspective in society is a view of society that focuses on the way diverse parts of society have functions, or realistic effects that maintain the stability of the whole. Durkheim developed the idea of society as an integrated system of interrelated parts. He wanted to establish how the various parts of society contribute to the maintenance of the whole. He also centre on how various elements of social structure function to maintain social order and equilibrium. Durkheim stressed that culture is the product of a community and non of single individuals. He argued that the ultimate reality of human life is sociological and not psychological. T he sociological reality, which Durkheim called the bodied conscience, exists beyond the individual and individual actions. Durkheim characterizes collective conscience as a totality of beliefs and sentiments common to average citizens of the analogous society forms a determinate system which has its own life (Ritzer, 82). In Durkheims opinion a whole is not identical to the bring of its parts, thus society is not just a mere rundown of individu... ...sbands property (Ritzer, 63). Marx says that this corresponds precisely the definition of unequal division of fight in the modern society. Where an employer degraded a worker until the worker becomes the tete-a-tete property of the industry and therefore no different than a slave. except as a slave is not free to decide whether or not to work on a given day, neither is the worker. Both must work in order to survive. Ultimately, many social thinkers in the history of sociology have challenged the topic of social structure in thei r works. complaisant thinkers like Emile Durkheim and Karl Marx have spent their entire lives formulating theories that would explain the status of individuals in societies. From a functionalist perspective sociologist like Emile Durkheim looks at society as a system with various parts that contribute to the maintenance of the whole. On the other hand Karl Marx, a conflict theorist, stresses that society is a complex system characterized by inequality and conflict that generate social change. Both theorists looked at a social system as a set of reciprocally supporting elements, unlike for Mark, it was hard for Durkheim to explain how change might make it in a society.